| 30925588 |
false |
|
true |
The application has been scrutinized and it has been observed that:
1. The Classification of land use certificate has not been submitted by the project Proponent.
2. The water demand calculation given in the feasibility report is arithmetically incorrect.
3. There is a discrepancy in the capacity of the STP installed by the PP in the STP feasibility report and in the project report.
4. The layout plan attached by the Project Proponent is not legible.
5. The Project Proponent has proposed to install an STP based on a novel technology, namely Biopipe. The PP is requested to provide detailed information on this technology, specifically explaining how it will achieve the prescribed limits for COD, TSS, Fat, Oil, and Grease in the treated effluent. The PP shall also submit the relevant accreditation/certification for this technology and examples from other projects in where the proposed technology has been successfully implemented.
Therefore the Project Proponent is requested to address above clarifications within 2 days.
|
2026-01-15 16:37:35.823 |
