| 31832622 |
false |
|
false |
|
2026-04-23 15:24:08.122 |
| 31901437 |
false |
|
true |
The application submitted by the applicant was scrutinised and it was observed that :-
1.The industry is required to submit the details of increase in fixed assets alongwith year wise CA certificate in order to adjudge the adequacy of consent fee required as per consent fee slab.
2.The industry has now submitted the rent deed. However, The C.A. certificate submitted does not reflect the value of lease which needs to be added for the total gross block of the fixed assets. As the land and building has been mentioned on lease, the value of rent for lease period needs to be incorporated in the total fixed assets so as to adjudge the consent fee required as per consent fee slab.
3.The industry needs to submit fresh land use classification in order to assess the current status of the land use classification of the industry.
Please submit reply/clarify within 02 days. |
2026-05-02 13:41:14.154 |
| 31949199 |
false |
|
false |
|
2026-05-07 22:18:51.898 |
| 30950998 |
false |
|
false |
|
2026-01-19 18:42:23.005 |
| 30972383 |
false |
|
false |
Sir, we are going to install drier and increase production of rice 2.0 T/hour to 3.0 T/hour by proceessing of paddy 3.0 T/hour to 4.5 T/hour and no additional land has been added. No plant and machinery for enhance capacity and drier has been install yet and we will install the additional machinery after urinating NOC for expansion. |
2026-01-21 15:09:19.339 |
| 30994398 |
false |
|
false |
|
2026-01-23 16:40:31.55 |
| 30999928 |
false |
|
true |
The application of the project proponent has been scrutinized and it was observed that:-
1) The project proponent was granted Environmental Clearance based on approved layout plan by CTP vide Letter no. 5464 CTP(Pb)/ MPM-150 dated 10.10.2019. However, the plan of the project was further amended vide CTP letter no. 6379CTP(PB)/MPM-150 dated 22.10.2021. The project proponent has not obtained amended Environmental Clearance.
2) The project proponent has not submitted calculation of the population, water pollution load and solid waste generation details of the component of the project, for which it has applied for CTO of the Board.
3) The project proponent has not submitted feasibility report as well as water balance sheet with the online application form.
The same two clarifications at serial number 2 and 3 were earlier also raised in the previously returned application but the project proponent has not attached any document/annexure of water calculation, water pollution load, solid waste generation details and feasibility report. It has submitted a document titled “reply” but the annexures mentioned have not been attached by the project proponent in it’s written reply.
4) The project proponent has not submitted approved site plan with the online application form.
5) The project proponent has not submitted aksajra plan ear-marking the location of the project and land measuring 1.5 acres reserved for karnal technology along with Khasra no.
6) The project proponent has not submitted authenticated proof regarding CSR activities.
You are hereby requested to clarify the same within 02 days, so that your application can be processed further.
|
2026-01-24 20:01:22.322 |
| 31000654 |
false |
|
false |
Fee linked |
2026-01-25 13:59:48.991 |
| 31001481 |
false |
|
false |
|
2026-01-25 20:07:24.941 |
| 31002044 |
true |
|
false |
|
2026-01-26 10:17:13.291 |
