| 30954305 |
false |
|
true |
The application was scrutinized and it was observed that:
1. The project proponent has declared the total project cost as Rs. 3.60 Crore in the project report, wherein the cost of land has been indicated as merely Rs. 25.00 lakh, which appears to be on the lower side. No land ownership documents or registered sale deed have been submitted to substantiate the declared cost of land. Since any variation in the project cost has a direct bearing on the applicable Consent to Establish (CTE) fee payable to the Board. The project proponent is therefore required to submit copies of registered land ownership/registration deeds for verification of land cost vis-à-vis ownership, or alternatively, submit the cost of land duly certified by a Chartered Accountant based on the prevailing collector rate of the area.
2. It is further observed that the calculation of fresh water requirement, as reflected in the feasibility report, is not in accordance with the provisions of the National Building Code, 2016 (Part-9), Section 4.1. The feasibility report submitted by the project proponent does not adhere to the above norms. The project proponent is therefore required to revise the calculations relating to water consumption, wastewater generation, treated wastewater recycling and disposal accordingly, and submit a revised feasibility report.
3. The feasibility report also lacks proper details regarding solid waste generation and management. The project proponent has not furnished quantified details of biodegradable and non-biodegradable solid waste generation, nor has it clearly outlined the proposed disposal mechanism. Further, if compost pits or mechanical composters are proposed for biodegradable waste management, the capacity and operational details of the same are required to be clearly specified.
4. It is further observed that while a 5-metre green buffer is stated to have been left as per the building bye-laws and the project proponent has proposed to develop plantation area as per Karnal Technology in the said area for utilization of its excess treated effluent.
Further, the application was earlier also returned with the same above observations. However, the project proponent has re-submitted the same without attending to the observations.
You are hereby request to clarify the same within 02 days, so that your application can be processed further. |
2026-01-20 10:49:07.344 |
