Show ApplicationProcessingDetails

Id: 20451862
Approve: false
Approve Note:
Clarification: false
Clarification Note:
Date Created: 2022-11-21 15:32:39.517
File Note: <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Mam, the point wise reply is as under:</p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The fee deposited by the promoter company is adequate upto 31.12.2024 as per circular dated 29.10.2018. Earlier, penalty was inadvertently calculated as 600%; however, the same is 500%. Further, the previous pending fee has now been considered as per latest office order dated 29.10.2018.</p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The STP is not in operation due to very less generation of effluent as only 7-8 houses have residents. The effluent is currently being treated in the multiple chamber collection tank being utilized as septic tank. The energy meter has been provided and a condition was already imposed for installation of water meter.</p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">3.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->Earlier, the consent was granted for 01 no. house that was constructed at that point of time. However, now it has been recommended for 20 no. houses. The current construction and occupancy status has been mentioned in the note.</p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">4.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The unit has not provided any DG set being a plotting complex. As such, has not applied for air consent.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Submitted please as per earlier recommendations.</p>
Inspection: false
Inspection Note:
Officer: PPCB145
Reject: false
Reject Note:
Role: RO AEE Harsimaran Singh