| File Note: |
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">It is intimated that While granted the previous CTO, then EE, RO, requested to check the documents submitted by the industry, check compliance with the conditions of this letter, carry out effluent monitoring and send the report in this regard through e-noting.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">Now the industry has applied for CTO under the air Act, of 1974 </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">RO has also reported that a telephonic complaint was received against the industry from CTSDF. Now RO has processed the CTO under Air Act,1974 without visit as per circular no. CEE (HQ)/F.No./957/2016/59 dated 02/02/2016. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">If approved RO may be requested to visit the industry to verify the facts of the complaint as well as give his comments on the adequacy /efficiency of the Air pollution control device installed by the industry and send a fresh recommendation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p> |
