| File Note: |
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">It is intimated that while granted the previous CTO under the Water Act,1974 then RO was requested to visit the site to verify the statement given by the industry and carry out the audit and send the report along with recommendations.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">Now the industry has applied for the CTO under the Water Act, of 1974 and RO has reported that the industry is not maintaining the record properly and is lifting more than the agreement quantity& hence need to get the agreement revised.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">But RO has not carried out a physical water audit of fresh water used in the process and trade effluent got left to the authorized CTEP operator.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> If approved SCN for the refusal of renewal of CTO under the Water Act, 1974 with an opportunity to submit a written reply within 7 days. EE, RO may also be requested to give his comments on the reply to be submitted by the industry .</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">( Competency: SEE Sir)</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; mso-line-height-alt: 5.35pt; background: white; margin: 0in 0in .0001pt .5in;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p> |
