| File Note: |
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">Kindly peruse the note and recommendation given by RO. It is intimated that the industry has applied for renewal CTO under the Water Act, of 1974 and the industry is doing surface treatment mainly Zinc plating to make tractor parts, washers, springs, and steel parts. As per the above report, the industry has made an expansion of about 13.34 crore, the industry has not maintained the record of freshwater consumption in the process, and it has not maintained the record of traded effluent got left to the CETP operator. The industry has not produced the production record, so the visiting officer could not verify the expansion made by the industry. The industry has not a permanent pipeline to carry the effluent from the manufacturing process to the trade effluent collection tank. The industry has not installed adequate APCD to capture the process emission generated from the HCL dip as well as not installed the sampling arrangements on the stack. The industry has installed one additional DG set.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">May if approved SCN for refusal renewal CTO under the Water Act,1974 applied by the PP be issued with an opportunity to submit the reply within 10 days. EE RO may also be requested to give his comments on the reply to be submitted by the PP as well as comments on what was trade effluent mode of disposal, how much concentration of emission in the HCL process area was during the visit, and send the fresh recommendation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">( Competency: CEE)</span></p> |
