| File Note: |
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><span lang="EN-IN">Kindly peruse the note and recommendation given by RO. It is intimated that PP has applied the CTE for </span><span lang="EN-IN">having 112 flats </span>for a total wastewater generation of 68 .40 KLD. <span lang="EN-IN">The treated wastewater will be used for flushing purposes, and gardening, and the excess treated wastewater will be disposed of through an electric evaporator after a capacity of 70KLD.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-IN" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">It is intimated RO has reported that the site is suitable for such type of project. But PP has not elaborated that which electric technology along with a detailed dimensional drawing will be used for evaporation to evaporate the treated wastewater quantity of 35 KLD after STP to be generated from the project.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-IN" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">May if approved SCN for refusal of CTE with an opportunity personal hearing before the CEE to be issued PP. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-IN" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">( Competency: CEE)</span></p> |