| Clarification Note: |
Mar 31, 2023
REPLY TO OBSERVATIONS
Point wise reply to the Observations raised is as under :
1. The project proponent has not linked consent fees with the application under Water Act, 1974 and Air Act, 1981.
FEE LINKED PLEASE.
2. The project proponent is required to deposit NOC regularization amounting to Rs 2900/- for increase in assets amounting to Rs 42 Lakh.
RS. 2900.00 DEPOSITED PLEASE.
3. The project proponent was granted Consent to Establish under the provision of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 for installation of STP of capacity 20 KLD based on SAF technology. Now the project proponent has applied for fresh Consent to Operate under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 for installation of STP of capacity of 50 KLD based on MBR technology.
INITIALLY AND AS PER DESIGN PARAMETERS, STP OF CAPACITY 20 KLD WITH SAFF TECHNOLOGY WAS RECOMMENDED BUT LATER ON DUE TO ANTICIPATED ADDITONAL LOAD OF EATERIES/FOODCOURTS, STP OF CAPACITY 50 KLD WAS INSTALLED. AS THE SPACE DESIGNATED FOR STP WAS ACCORDING TO 20 KLD PLANT AND DUE TO INCREASED CAPACITY AND SIZE (50 KLD) AND LESS SPACE AVAILABLE, MBR TECHNOLOGY WAS PREFERRED FOR ITS COMPACT DESIGN. IT IS ENSURED THAT THERE WILL BE NO EFFECT ON RESULTS OF TREATED WATER DUE TO THUS CHANGE AND ALL PPCB NORMS WILL BE FOLLOWED STRICTLY.
4. The project proponent has submitted letter of MC Zirakpur dated 18.10.21 regarding disposal of 6.48 KLD treated waste-water into MC sewer subject to deposition of charges and capacity of sewer available at that time. Hence, it is requested to submit latest clearance letter of MC sewer regarding release of sewer connection to the project for 6.48 KLD treated sewer.
KEEPING IN VIEW THE LACK OF ADEQUATE STP CAPACITY OF MC ZIRAKPUR AT PRESENT. WE WILL DISPOSE OFF OUR SURPLUS TREATED WATER INTO VACANT LAND FOR PLANTATION AS PER KARNAL TECHNOLOGY. THIS LAND IS OWNED BY THIS SAME GROUP M/S KRISHANG BUIDTECH PVT LTD. AND IS IN BALAUNGI, DISTT SAS NAGAR, HARDLY 15 KM FROM PROJECT SITE. THE TRANSPORTATION WILL BE DONE THROUGH 10 NO. MOBILE TANKERS ALREADY PLANNED TO BE HIRED FOR THIS PURPOSE. A SEPARATE RESOLUTION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS IN THIS RESPECT IS ANNEXED PLEASE.
5. The project proponent is required to submit floor wise plan clearly showing the details of 69 Showrooms and 12 shops & mentioning built up area of project, for which it is applying for Consent to Operate.
NEEDFUL DONE PLEASE.
6. The project proponent in the feasibility report submitted along with NOC application has calculated population taking 5 person per SCO and show room but the calculation done is not right as the project proponent has also proposed restaurant and food court within its project as per information given during visit.
AMENDED FEASIBILITY REPORT ALONG WITH CALCULATION DETAILS COVERED IN IT, ANNEXED PLEASE.
REQUESTED TO PLEASE CONSIDER ABOVE AS OUR REPLY TO THE OBSERVATIONS RAISED BY BOARD FOR EARLY GRANT OF CTOs & DELAY IN REPLY IS DEEPLY REGRETTED.
Warm Regards
|
| File Note: |
Mar 31, 2023
REPLY TO OBSERVATIONS
Point wise reply to the Observations raised is as under :
1. The project proponent has not linked consent fees with the application under Water Act, 1974 and Air Act, 1981.
FEE LINKED PLEASE.
2. The project proponent is required to deposit NOC regularization amounting to Rs 2900/- for increase in assets amounting to Rs 42 Lakh.
RS. 2900.00 DEPOSITED PLEASE.
3. The project proponent was granted Consent to Establish under the provision of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 for installation of STP of capacity 20 KLD based on SAF technology. Now the project proponent has applied for fresh Consent to Operate under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 for installation of STP of capacity of 50 KLD based on MBR technology.
INITIALLY AND AS PER DESIGN PARAMETERS, STP OF CAPACITY 20 KLD WITH SAFF TECHNOLOGY WAS RECOMMENDED BUT LATER ON DUE TO ANTICIPATED ADDITONAL LOAD OF EATERIES/FOODCOURTS, STP OF CAPACITY 50 KLD WAS INSTALLED. AS THE SPACE DESIGNATED FOR STP WAS ACCORDING TO 20 KLD PLANT AND DUE TO INCREASED CAPACITY AND SIZE (50 KLD) AND LESS SPACE AVAILABLE, MBR TECHNOLOGY WAS PREFERRED FOR ITS COMPACT DESIGN. IT IS ENSURED THAT THERE WILL BE NO EFFECT ON RESULTS OF TREATED WATER DUE TO THUS CHANGE AND ALL PPCB NORMS WILL BE FOLLOWED STRICTLY.
4. The project proponent has submitted letter of MC Zirakpur dated 18.10.21 regarding disposal of 6.48 KLD treated waste-water into MC sewer subject to deposition of charges and capacity of sewer available at that time. Hence, it is requested to submit latest clearance letter of MC sewer regarding release of sewer connection to the project for 6.48 KLD treated sewer.
KEEPING IN VIEW THE LACK OF ADEQUATE STP CAPACITY OF MC ZIRAKPUR AT PRESENT. WE WILL DISPOSE OFF OUR SURPLUS TREATED WATER INTO VACANT LAND FOR PLANTATION AS PER KARNAL TECHNOLOGY. THIS LAND IS OWNED BY THIS SAME GROUP M/S KRISHANG BUIDTECH PVT LTD. AND IS IN BALAUNGI, DISTT SAS NAGAR, HARDLY 15 KM FROM PROJECT SITE. THE TRANSPORTATION WILL BE DONE THROUGH 10 NO. MOBILE TANKERS ALREADY PLANNED TO BE HIRED FOR THIS PURPOSE. A SEPARATE RESOLUTION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS IN THIS RESPECT IS ANNEXED PLEASE.
5. The project proponent is required to submit floor wise plan clearly showing the details of 69 Showrooms and 12 shops & mentioning built up area of project, for which it is applying for Consent to Operate.
NEEDFUL DONE PLEASE.
6. The project proponent in the feasibility report submitted along with NOC application has calculated population taking 5 person per SCO and show room but the calculation done is not right as the project proponent has also proposed restaurant and food court within its project as per information given during visit.
AMENDED FEASIBILITY REPORT ALONG WITH CALCULATION DETAILS COVERED IN IT, ANNEXED PLEASE.
REQUESTED TO PLEASE CONSIDER ABOVE AS OUR REPLY TO THE OBSERVATIONS RAISED BY BOARD FOR EARLY GRANT OF CTOs & DELAY IN REPLY IS DEEPLY REGRETTED.
Warm Regards
|
