Show ApplicationProcessingDetails

Id: 22312079
Approve: false
Approve Note:
Clarification: false
Clarification Note:
Date Created: 2023-06-05 09:55:26.209
File Note: <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">Major Violations</span></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span></strong></span><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>Industry is allowed to maintain only single <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>outlet leading to CETP Conveyance System. Despite at responsible position and Director of PDA, and well aware of this stipulation, industry was found maintaining outlets other than CETP conveyance system deliberately which could be misused for the discharge untreated trade effluent.</span></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span></strong></span><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">Though, as per RO report dated 31.05.2023 no bye-pass was observed and apparently as per report it is case of blockage of sewer. However, due to such negligence of industries, lot of embarrassment had to face by the Board as well as the dyeing industry because newspapers highlighted this overflow as a bye-pass of untreated effluent from the industry.</span></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">3.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span></strong></span><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">The industry has yet to EC amounting Rs. 50,000 /- imposed for emitting black smoke.</span></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">4.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span></strong></span><span class="txt"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">The matter w.r.t. 1 has also moved through e-noting.</span></strong></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-align: justify;"><span class="txt"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">In view of the RO / EE (ZL) recommendations, show cause notice for refusal of consent to operate under Water Act, 1974 and Air Act, 1981 along with notice <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>u/s 33-A of the Water Act, 1974 may be issued to the industry with opportunity of personal hearing before Worthy Chairman of the Board, please. </span></span></p>
Inspection: false
Inspection Note:
Officer: PPCB032
Reject: false
Reject Note:
Role: ZO SEE R K Ratra