Show ApplicationProcessingDetails

Id: 24799297
Approve: false
Approve Note:
Clarification: false
Clarification Note:
Date Created: 2024-01-28 20:25:56.733
File Note: <p><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI','sans-serif'; color: black;">&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->Whether, the industry is complying with previous CTE conditions whereby it was directed to install its APCD and chimney is khasra numbers 39,9/1/1 only ?</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->The CTE (expansion) granted to the project proponent was for 160 KLD and the industry had then proposed plantation area @ 3.1 acre for disposal of effluent. Now vide application under consideration no reasons have been specified for decrease in trade effluent to 128 KLD for the same production capacity as proposed earlier. Moreover, has the industry developed 3.1 acres as per karnal technology ? Pl clarify</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">3.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->As per DTP certificate 11 KVA HT wire passes through the site. Pl clarify whether the industry is fulfilling the guidelines prescribed vide which the industry shall not be located in HT transmission zone.</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">4.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->The completion certificate submitted by industry doesn&rsquo;t reflect capacity of ETP installed ? Pl clarify</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">5.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->Pl report pointwise compliance for handling,transportation, storage and disposal of ash as prescribed vide GoP notification dated 15.10.2013 for such units.</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">6.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]-->As per the previous documents submitted with previous CTE, the total land area of the project ( after expansion) was proposed @ 34K-14M. However, as per the agenda note attached with the application , the land area is 59K-16M. Has the industry submitted submitted revenue record for the abovementioned additional land area acquired i.e 25K-02 M ? Pl submit details of the same. Has the industry submitted tehsildar certificate to certify fulfillment of distances of the said land area (25K-2M) from nearby landmarks as prescribed vide GoP notification dated 15.10.2013 for such units? If so, bring details. Is any industrial activity being carried out on said additional land area (25-2M)? If so bring details. Further, bring non record comments of visiting officer w.r.t observations made during visit regarding fulfillment distances as prescribed vide GoP notification dated 15.10.2013.</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">7.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>Were the stacks of APCD attached to boiler and other section, clear ? Pl report</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;"><!-- [if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">8.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>Is the office in receipt of original distance report from DTP and tehsildar ?</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="margin-left: .5in; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">Pl submit a complete detailed report including reply to aforementioned observations alongwith fresh recommendations in the matter</p>
Inspection: false
Inspection Note:
Officer: PPCB082
Reject: false
Reject Note:
Role: RO EE Guneet Sethi