Show ApplicationProcessingDetails

Id: 25446323
Approve: false
Approve Note:
Clarification: false
Clarification Note:
Date Created: 2024-04-18 12:59:47.413
File Note: The industry was given personal hearing before the Senior Environmental Engineer, Zonal Office-I, Ludhiana on 15.04.2024 w.r.t. show cause notice for refusal of 'Consent to Establish' (NOC) under the Water Act, 1974 and Air Act, 1981, wherein, it was decided that the Environmental Engineer, Regional Office shall verify submission made by industry and send fresh recommendations in the matter. Submissions of the industry Sh. Ved Parkash, Owner submitted during hearing that: 1. They have obtained approval from MC Maloudh for discharge MC sewerage vide no. 1086 dated 15.12.2023 and No objection certificate from Municipal Council Maloud vide no. 247 dated 02.04.2024. 2. Now, they have proposed STP of capacity 100 KLD and giving revised feasibility report. 3. They have submitted C.A certificate including capital investment of Land. Point wise verification of submissions 1. The project proponent has also submitted Nagar Council, Maloudh letter no. 1086 dated 15.12.2023, which is reproduced as under: “ਉਪੋਰਕਤ ਵਿਸ਼ੇ ਅਤੇ ਹਵਾਲੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਆਪ ਜੀ ਨੂੰ ਦੱਸਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ:  ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਕਲੋਨੀ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਦੇ ਪੱਤਰ ਮੀਮੋ ਨੰ. 7277 ਮਿਤੀ 06/11/2023 ਰਾਹੀਂ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਨ ਹੈ।  ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਨਿਯਮਾਂ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਐਸ.ਟੀ.ਪੀ. ਤੋਂ ਮੇਨ ਮੋਜੂਦਾ ਸੀਵਰ ਲਾਈਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਾਣੀ ਸੁੱਟਣ ਦੀ ਮੰਜ਼ੂਰੀ ਇਸ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਤੇ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਮੇਨ ਸੀਵਰ ਲਾਈਨ ਤੱਕ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਸੀਵਰੇਜ ਆਪਣੇ ਖਰਚੇ ਤੇ ਪਾਉਣ ਦੇ ਪਾਬੰਧ ਹੋਵੋਗੇ।  ਨਗਰ ਕੌਂਸਲ ਮਲੌਦ ਇਸ ਕਲੋਨੀ ਦੇ ਗਾਰਬੇਜ ਨੂੰ ਚੁੱਕ ਕੇ ਲੈਜਾਣ ਦੀ ਸਹਿਮਤੀ ਇਸ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਤੇ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਗਾਰਬੇਜ ਕੁਲੈਕਸ਼ਨ ਸੈਂਟਰ ਆਪਣੇ ਖਰਚੇ ਤੇ ਪੱਕਾ ਬਣਾਉਗੇ ਅਤੇ ਨਿਯਮਾਂ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਸਮੇਂ ਨਿਰਧਾਰਤ ਫੀਸ ਐਗਰੀਮੈਂਟ ਕਰਕੇ ਜਮਾ ਕਰਵਾਉਣ ਦੇ ਪਾਬੰਧ ਹੋਵੋਗੇ। ਇਹ ਆਪ ਦੀ ਸੂਚਨਾ ਹਿੱਤ ਹੈ।” 2. No, it has not proposed STP of capacity 100 KLD and not submitted revised feasibility report. It is pertinent to mention here that the project proponent is required to install STP of capacity atleast 150 KLD at the site as per the calculation mentioned in earlier report. 3. The project proponent has not mentioned value of land in the CA certificate. However, it has mentioned the same in the project report i.e. Land amounting to Rs. 50 Lacs. It has submitted CA certificate for Rs. 129.16 lacs (excluding land value). If the land value may be added in the CA certificate than amount comes out to be 179.16 lacs i.e. between the slab of 1 crore to 2 crore. Short comings in the case 1. The project proponent has not proposed Sewage Treatment Plant of adequate capacity. 2. The project proponent has not proposed usage of treated wastewater for plantation and flushing purpose by providing duel plumbing system and remaining into MC sewer incompliance to Punjab Pollution Control Board office order no. 315 dated 05.07.2018. In view of above, it is recommended that ‘consent to establish'/ (NOC) applied the project proponent may be refused.
Inspection: false
Inspection Note:
Officer: PPCB134
Reject: false
Reject Note:
Role: RO AEE Rubal Goyal