Show ApplicationProcessingDetails

Id: 26092487
Approve: false
Approve Note:
Clarification: false
Clarification Note:
Date Created: 2024-07-01 15:09:39.005
File Note: 1. Figures of fixed assets mentioned in agenda note by AEE and those mentioned in CA certificate are entirely different ( 3 .5 times then the figure mentioned in agenda). 2. At the time of NOC the industry has proposed project cost of 1.44 crore whereas, now the fixed asset in CA certificate are mentioned as 4.78 crore. 3. As per application form and agenda note, date of commissioning is mentioned as 1.1.23, whereas as per AEE Report, the industry has started on trial basis. As such above statement are in contradiction. In view of the above, It is to clarify a).Reasons for 3.5 time increase of assets then proposed at the time of NOC. Whether can any additional machinery or higher capacity machines have been installed comparing to NOC. b). Whether, difference of NOC fee@2400 has been deposited by the industry on account of increase in proposed assets from 1.44 crore to 4.78 crore. c).If date of commissioning is 1.1.23, then how the fee is adequate upto 30.09.2028. d). If the industry is recently commissioned then it is supposed to deposit the CTE regularization fee for 1 yr more that is from 6.7.23 onwards. e). Recheck the consent fees accordingly and certify period of adequacy Dealing officer (AEE) is advised to careful while reporting and to reexamine the above issues. 1. Figures of fixed assets mentioned in agenda note by AEE and those mentioned in CA certificate are entirely different ( 3 .5 times then the figure mentioned in agenda). 2. At the time of NOC the industry has proposed project cost of 1.44 crore whereas, now the fixed asset in CA certificate are mentioned as 4.78 crore. 3. As per application form and agenda note, date of commissioning is mentioned as 1.1.23, whereas as per AEE Report, the industry has started on trial basis. As such above statement are in contradiction. In view of the above, It is to clarify a).Reasons for 3.5 time increase of assets then proposed at the time of NOC. Whether can any additional machinery or higher capacity machines have been installed comparing to NOC. b). Whether, difference of NOC fee@2400 has been deposited by the industry on account of increase in proposed assets from 1.44 crore to 4.78 crore. c).If date of commissioning is 1.1.23, then how the fee is adequate upto 30.09.2028. d). If the industry is recently commissioned then it is supposed to deposit the CTE regularization fee for 1 yr more that is from 6.7.23 onwards. e). Recheck the consent fees accordingly and certify period of adequacy Dealing officer (AEE) is advised to careful while reporting and to reexamine the above issues.
Inspection: false
Inspection Note:
Officer: PPCB032
Reject: false
Reject Note:
Role: ZO SEE R K Ratra