| Id: | 30804559 |
| Approve: | false |
| Approve Note: | |
| Clarification: | true |
| Clarification Note: | On scrutinizing the application of the project proponent, it was observed as under: 1. Earlier, the project proponent had obtained Consent to operate and submitted CA certificate with the value of fixed assets of Rs. 84.26 lakh. Now, the project proponent has applied for varied Consent to operate and submitted CA certificate with the value of fixed assets of Rs. 82.89 lakh. The project proponent needs to clarify reason for decrease in fixed assets of plant & machinery cost. 2. The project has carried out expansion in the production. Hence, the project proponent needs to submit land suitability certificate from DTP. 3. The fixed assets and the plant and machinery cost mentioned in the application form and in the CA certificate is contradictory. You are therefore requested to submit reply by today. |
| Date Created: | 2026-01-01 14:34:11.403 |
| File Note: | On scrutinizing the application of the project proponent, it was observed as under: 1. Earlier, the project proponent had obtained Consent to operate and submitted CA certificate with the value of fixed assets of Rs. 84.26 lakh. Now, the project proponent has applied for varied Consent to operate and submitted CA certificate with the value of fixed assets of Rs. 82.89 lakh. The project proponent needs to clarify reason for decrease in fixed assets of plant & machinery cost. 2. The project has carried out expansion in the production. Hence, the project proponent needs to submit land suitability certificate from DTP. 3. The fixed assets and the plant and machinery cost mentioned in the application form and in the CA certificate is contradictory. You are therefore requested to submit reply by today. |
| Inspection: | false |
| Inspection Note: | |
| Officer: | PPCB139 |
| Reject: | false |
| Reject Note: | |
| Role: | RO AEE Aushpreet Singh |