| 31385620 |
false |
|
true |
The application submitted by the project proponent has been scrutinized and it was observed as under:
1. The project proponent has not filled complete application form i.e. PART-B: TECHNICAL INFORMATION(GENERAL): & PART-D: TECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR CONSENT UNDER AIR ACT, 1981.
2. The project proponent has not submitted bank guarantee amounting to Rs. 65 lacs as per decisions no. 1 of the personal hearing held on 01.07.2025.
3. The project proponent has not submitted compliance report of the decisions of the personal hearing held on 01.07.2025 before the Chairman of the Board.
4. The project proponent has not deposited balance Environmental Compensation amounting to Rs. 63.15 lacs till date.
5. The project proponent has not submitted compliance report of the conditions of Environmental Clearance granted by the Competent Authority.
6. The project proponent has applied for renewal of consent to operate under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. However, the detail filled in the application form is not in consonance with earlier granted consent to operate and showing huge increase in water requirement, water consumption, wastewater generation, wastewater treatment & wastewater disposal detail. The project proponent needs to clarify the same.
It is requested to submit the reply to the clarification within 02 days. Until then, the application will be treated as incomplete.
|
2026-03-05 17:15:52.341 |
| 30858005 |
false |
|
true |
On scrutinizing the application of the project proponent, it was observed that earlier the application was refused by the Board and application submitted thereafter was returned with following observations, keeping in view the observations mentioned at the time of refusal of Consent to establish (NOC).
1. The project proponent needs to submit additional proposal for disposal of treated wastewater. However, earlier the Consent to establish (NOC) was refused due to one of the main observations that the project proponent has proposed to discharge 78 KLD onto land for irrigation/green area of about 3138 sqm, which is inadequate. Further, the Board is receiving complaints from residents of group housing societies in various commissions and consumer courts regarding deviation from approved plans. As the society is selling its plots to the consumers showing lush green parts with various amenities, as such use of green area as per Karnal Technology will be source of nuisance/smell/vector borne diseases to the residents and will be a source of future complaints.
2. As per point no. 2, now, the project proponent has applied for discharge of 94 KLD onto land for plantation as per Karnal Technology, which is inadequate.
3. The project proponent is required to submit an environmentally friendly proposal for the discharge of domestic effluent. However, the Karnal technology proposal is not feasible for implementation inside the residential area.
Now, the project proponent has again applied for Consent to establish (NOC), however, the reply attached by the project proponent was not satisfactory. In view of above you are requested to submit additional environment friendly proposal for the discharge of treated effluent, keeping in view nuisance/smell/vector borne diseases to the residents during discharge of such significant quantity of wastewater.
You are therefore requested to submit the reply by 12:00 noon tomorrow.
|
2026-01-07 17:46:02.903 |
